Respuesta :
A court decides to interpret a law in a way that encourages the limitation of a judge’s power. The court relies on similar past rulings and stays very close to the literal meaning of the constitution in its approach. This court is engaging in judicial precedent. The correct answer is D.
A court decision that is cited as a constitutional power for the underlying legal concept is referred to as precedent. The decision is determined according to the legal precedent by looking at similar cases that have already happened in the past.
The precedent doctrine, often referred to as stare judgment, or abiding by the decision, is based on the idea that cases should be resolved similarly when they are comparable. The stare decision principle holds that the court's decision should be used as precedent in future instances with a comparable legal issue.
your question is incomplete but most probably your full question was
A court decides to interpret a law in a way that encourages the limitation of a judge’s power. The court relies on similar past rulings and stays very close to the literal meaning of the Constitution in its approach.
This court is engaging in judicial:
a) restraint.
b) review.
c) activism.
d) precedent.
Learn more about judicial precedent at https://brainly.com/question/29791689
#SPJ4
