contestada

What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?
He was free because he had lived in free states.
He was free because he was now a slaveholder.
He should not have been captured because he was a fugitive.
He should get his property back through due process.

Respuesta :

Answer:

He was free because he had lived in free states.

Explanation:

I am in Junior High learning this. I did the quiz this was the answer.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

right on edge

Otras preguntas